[Eeglablist] EEG/ERP and TMS

[Mari, Zoltan (NIH/NINDS)]

What do you mean? Steady noise? From a TMS pulse? I am confused.
Zoltan Mari, M.D.

-----Original Message-----
From: nima dehghani [mailto:nimadehghani at scientist.com] 
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 13:52
To: Vladimir Litvak
Cc: eeglablist at sccn.ucsd.edu
Subject: RE: [Eeglablist] EEG/ERP and TMS


Dear Dr. Litvak
when i was reading your reply, a question arised in my mind! one of the
solutions that you proposed: "disconnecting the electrodes from the
amplifiers shortly before the TMS pulse and reconnecting them as rapidly as
possible after the pulse" may reduce the noises during the intervals; but in
the other hand, "EXACTLY" at the time of reconnection, it may induce a great
disturbance in the system which could possibly last for "fashionable" amount
of time!... what is your idea?and did you experienced it yourself? and is
not it better to record in a steady noisy environment than having no noise
at some moments PLUS great disturbances at other times? steady noises, at
least, may give us chance for postprocessing filtering more easily! cheers
nima dehghani 
Babak Imaging Center

----- Original Message -----
From: "Vladimir Litvak" <litvak at alice.nc.huji.ac.il>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 08:29:22 +0200 
To: "'Jim Kroger'" <jimkk at umich.edu>, <eeglablist at sccn.ucsd.edu>
Subject: RE: [Eeglablist] EEG/ERP and TMS

Re: Only the first paper mentioned by Arno (Komssi et al.) is relevant for
Re: what you were asking. The second one does not involve EEG recordings. 
Re: 
Re: I have some personal experience with combining TMS and EEG and I also
Re: heard what other people are doing. Indeed, there are TMS artifacts that
Re: can saturate the EEG amplifiers for periods ranging from 20 ms to a few
Re: seconds (depending on the kind of the amplifier and the electrode
Re: position). In general there are two possible strategies for dealing with
Re: them. One approach is building a cut-off circuit that will disconnect
Re: the electrodes from the amplifiers shortly before the TMS pulse and
Re: reconnect them as rapidly as possible after the pulse. The drawback of
Re: this solution is that the reconnection will necessarily take time during
Re: which there will be no recording at all. The group at the Helsinki
Re: University Hospital where the technique was developed published a number
Re: of studies based on it. Check out http://www.biomag.helsinki.fi/  and
Re: also http://www.nexstim.com /
Re: The latter link is I think the only company that sells a complete
Re: TMS/EEG setup. There are also a number of people who built their own
Re: setups based on similar principles: Alvaro Pascual-Leone in Boston,
Re: Vincent Walsh in London and Walter Paulus in Goettingen. Perhaps there
Re: are others as well. The scheme of the circuit is available in the
Re: literature: 
Re: 
Re: Virtanen J, Ruohonen J, Naatanen R, Ilmoniemi RJ (1999) Instrumentation
Re: for the measurement of electric brain responses to transcranial magnetic
Re: stimulation. Med Biol Eng Comput 37:322-326.
Re: 
Re: Another approach is using an EEG system with a high dynamic range that
Re: will not be saturated by TMS artifacts. This approach has not been
Re: applied yet for TMS as far as I know but it is being developed to
Re: perform EEG recordings inside an fMRI device. In this case there will be
Re: large artifacts in the recordings but the recording system will not
Re: saturate, no data will be lost, and it might therefore be possible to
Re: remove artifacts by digital processing. I think EEG systems that can be
Re: used inside the fMRI scanner will become increasingly widespread and
Re: most of them will probably be good for TMS as well.
Re: 
Re: Best,
Re: 
Re: Vladimir Litvak
Re: Evoked Potentials Lab
Re: Technion - Israel Institute of Technology  
Re: 
Re: 
Re: -----Original Message-----
Re: From: eeglablist-admin at sccn.ucsd.edu
Re: [mailto:eeglablist-admin at sccn.ucsd.edu] On Behalf Of Jim Kroger
Re: Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 10:48 PM
Re: To: eeglablist at sccn.ucsd.edu
Re: Subject: [Eeglablist] EEG/ERP and TMS
Re: 
Re: I'm hearing some mention of using TMS with EEG/ERP. I presume the TMS 
Re: pulse will make collection of EEG data impossilbe for some period.
Re: 
Re: Has anybody experience with various data collection systems and TMS? 
Re: Are some better than others for this purpose? Any pointers to further 
Re: information?
Re: 
Re: Thanks
Re: Jim
Re: 
Re: _______________________________________________
Re: Eeglablist mailing list Eeglablist at sccn.ucsd.edu
Re: Eeglablist page: http://www.sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab/eeglabmail.html
Re: To unsubscribe, send an empty email to eeglablist-unsub at sccn.ucsd.edu
Re: 
Re: 
Re: _______________________________________________
Re: Eeglablist mailing list Eeglablist at sccn.ucsd.edu
Re: Eeglablist page: http://www.sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab/eeglabmail.html
Re: To unsubscribe, send an empty email to eeglablist-unsub at sccn.ucsd.edu



web:
http://www.iranmedical.com/HomePage/index.cfm?parampage=practice&id=nimadehg
hani
email:
nimadehghani at scientist.com, nimadehghani at iranmedical.com

-- 
__________________________________________________________
Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com
http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup

_______________________________________________
Eeglablist mailing list Eeglablist at sccn.ucsd.edu
Eeglablist page: http://www.sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab/eeglabmail.html
To unsubscribe, send an empty email to eeglablist-unsub at sccn.ucsd.edu