<html><div>Hi all,</div>
<br>
<div>I have a question about binica and runica.</div>
<br>
<div>I have installed matlab/eeglab under linux (Debian) and run binica
(included in eeglab 5.01b: ICA Version 1.4 Feb), that works fine
(binica is quite fast :-)), but the defined weight change of 1E-7
is reached much later than with runica and sometimes it isn't reached
even after 1000 steps (63 chans, QuickAmp). </div>
<br>
<div>In opposite with runica it does. Further the initial weight change
is very high. I used the same options like the runica defaults,
except the maximum number of steps (1000). I have used the same data for
both and have run them several times. The problem (if it is one) seems to
be solved by projecting the data into a subspace by pca.</div>
<br>
<div>So i wonder if there is a difference between runica and binica, or
if i made something wrong. </div>
<div>I would be deeply grateful for some suggestions.</div>
<br>
<div>best regards</div>
<br>
Sven.
<br>
<body>
<br><br>
<br>
--<br>
Dipl.-Psych. Sven Hoffmann<br>
Institute for Occupational Physiology at the University of Dortmund
(IfADo)<br>
Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors<br>
Ardeystr. 67<br>
D-44139 Dortmund<br>
Phone: +49-231-1084-338<br>
Email: shoffmann@ifado.de<br><br>
<br>
</body>
</html>