conny - I assume this may be because the phase coherence of the slower (1-Hz) activity produced in the figure by the trial phase sorting appears as a 'smear' of some sort...<br><br>scott makeig<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:06 AM, conny kranczioch <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:conny_kranczioch@yahoo.de">conny_kranczioch@yahoo.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div><div style="color:#000;background-color:#fff;font-family:arial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12pt"><div>Hi,<br><br>I've been using erpimage with the option 'phasesort'. Now when I change the frequency for the wavelet analysis, let's say form 1 Hz to 2 Hz the erpimage changes - for the lower frequency the erpimage becomes somehow smeared (horizontally). Why is that? I can see why the erpimage would look different in both cases as the phase would be different for the two frequencies, hence trials would be sorted differently. But why the smearing?<br>
<br>Thanks, Conny </div></div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Eeglablist page: <a href="http://sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab/eeglabmail.html" target="_blank">http://sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab/eeglabmail.html</a><br>
To unsubscribe, send an empty email to <a href="mailto:eeglablist-unsubscribe@sccn.ucsd.edu">eeglablist-unsubscribe@sccn.ucsd.edu</a><br>
For digest mode, send an email with the subject "set digest mime" to <a href="mailto:eeglablist-request@sccn.ucsd.edu">eeglablist-request@sccn.ucsd.edu</a><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Scott Makeig, Research Scientist and Director, Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience, Institute for Neural Computation; Prof. of Neurosciences (Adj.), University of California San Diego, La Jolla CA 92093-0559, <a href="http://sccn.ucsd.edu/%7Escott" target="_blank">http://sccn.ucsd.edu/~scott</a><br>