<div dir="ltr">Thanks Arnon for the deteiled report.<div>Ramon, do you think this is related to the bootstrap issue again?</div><div><br></div><div>Makoto</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Arnon Yang <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:abarnyeu@hotmail.com" target="_blank">abarnyeu@hotmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div><div dir="ltr">Hi Makoto,<br><br>Thanks for the quick reply.<br><br>The steps I took were this:<br>1. Import Netstation binary file into EEGLab. (The file has only 1 epoch and filters and ICA have not been ran yet.)<br>
2. Plot -> Time-frequency -> Cross-coherence pop_newcrossf()<br>3. I compared channels 1 and 2, in an epoch range 100 ms after the start and 100 ms before the end. Log scale for frequencies was set and phase coherence was used. Bootstrap significance level was set to default and 'padratio' = 1. <br>
4. From the output diagram, phase coherence reaches values as high as 1.3 e+007, as shown by the color side bar on the upper panel.<br><br>I've attached screenshots of pop_newcrossf() and the resulting figure.<br><br>
Thanks very much, Makoto.<br><br>Arnon<br><div class="hm HOEnZb"><br><br><br></div><div><div class="hm HOEnZb"><hr>From: <a href="mailto:mmiyakoshi@ucsd.edu" target="_blank">mmiyakoshi@ucsd.edu</a><br>Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 10:01:38 -0700<br>
Subject: Re: [Eeglablist] Why is Phase Coherence Greater than 1?<br>To: <a href="mailto:abarnyeu@hotmail.com" target="_blank">abarnyeu@hotmail.com</a>; <a href="mailto:nucleuscub@gmail.com" target="_blank">nucleuscub@gmail.com</a><br>
CC: <a href="mailto:eeglablist@sccn.ucsd.edu" target="_blank">eeglablist@sccn.ucsd.edu</a></div><div><div class="h5"><br><br><div dir="ltr">Dear Arnon,<div><br></div><div>Thanks for reporting it. Please describe how to replicate it in our environment so that we can work on it. Thank you for your cooperation.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Makoto</div>
</div><div><br><br><div>On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Mister Arnold <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:abarnyeu@hotmail.com" target="_blank">abarnyeu@hotmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote style="border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div><div dir="ltr">Hi all,<br><br>I have been trying to compare the phase coherence (phase locking value) of 2 channels of the same data set.<br><br>From my understanding, coherence should always be a value between 0 and 1. However, when I use the pop_newcrossf() function to plot the coherence, I obtain values which are as large as 1.30 e+007.<br>
<br>Is this expected and how can I change it back to a value that is between 0 and 1? <br><br>Any suggestions is appreciated. Thanks very much.<br><br>Arnon <br><br><br><br> </div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Eeglablist page: <a href="http://sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab/eeglabmail.html" target="_blank">http://sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab/eeglabmail.html</a><br>
To unsubscribe, send an empty email to <a href="mailto:eeglablist-unsubscribe@sccn.ucsd.edu" target="_blank">eeglablist-unsubscribe@sccn.ucsd.edu</a><br>
For digest mode, send an email with the subject "set digest mime" to <a href="mailto:eeglablist-request@sccn.ucsd.edu" target="_blank">eeglablist-request@sccn.ucsd.edu</a><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all">
<div><br></div>
-- <br><div dir="ltr">Makoto Miyakoshi<br>Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience<br>Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego<br></div>
</div></div></div></div> </div></div>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr">Makoto Miyakoshi<br>Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience<br>Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego<br></div>
</div>