<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
Hi all,<br>
<br>
Only after my posting to the list I Iearned that the two approaches
are not the same. Simply achieving the desired warping anchors via
subtraction led to ERSP plots that didn't make any sense (they were
entirely red in my case). Probably that is because the provided ms
values always (including the first one) relate to actual locations
in the epochs?<br>
<br>
Ole<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 23.09.2014 19:30, schrieb Makoto
Miyakoshi:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAEqC+SWAPG_utV0xdWiC4M=VPaUAs5C1s2Qkp3p0Aw-DrDGfHQ@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Dear Fiorenzo,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Could you share your recent experience with timewarp option
with him? Unfortunately I haven't used it myself.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Ramon, Ole is in your position in TUB. I appreciate your
support for him. I've heard timewarp option is either unstable
or limited to use somehow, but for the mobi research it will
be important.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Makoto </div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 4:16 AM, Ole
Traupe <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:ole.traupe@tu-berlin.de" target="_blank">ole.traupe@tu-berlin.de</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Dear all,<br>
<br>
I would like to see, whether I understood the 'timewarp'
option correctly.<br>
<br>
I have epoched my data according to one event, but I would
like to warp using some surrounding events. The latency of
the very first of these surrounding events shall finally be
0. Is there a difference between:<br>
<br>
a) epoching according to the first event<br>
b) simply adjusting the manually computed median latencies
(provided for the timewarp) by subtracting the first one?<br>
<br>
In my understanding, newtimef() sets the first latency and
warps the following accordingly. Then there would be no
difference. Is this how it's done?<br>
<br>
Ole<br>
<br>
-- <br>
<br>
Dr. Ole Traupe<br>
<br>
Labor Manager<br>
Biopsychologie und Neuroergonomie<br>
<br>
Postanschrift:<br>
Technische Universität Berlin<br>
Institut für Psychologie und Arbeitswissenschaft<br>
Sekr. MAR 3-2<br>
Marchstr. 23<br>
10587 Berlin<br>
<br>
Zimmer: MAR 3041<br>
Telefon: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="tel:%28%2B49%29%20030%20314%2022721"
value="+493031422721" target="_blank">(+49) 030 314 22721</a><br>
Fax: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="tel:%28%2B49%29%20030%20314%2025274"
value="+493031425274" target="_blank">(+49) 030 314 25274</a><br>
<br>
Email: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:ole.traupe@tu-berlin.de" target="_blank">ole.traupe@tu-berlin.de</a><br>
Website: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.bpn.tu-berlin.de" target="_blank">http://www.bpn.tu-berlin.de</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Eeglablist page: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab/eeglabmail.html"
target="_blank">http://sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab/eeglabmail.html</a><br>
To unsubscribe, send an empty email to <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:eeglablist-unsubscribe@sccn.ucsd.edu"
target="_blank">eeglablist-unsubscribe@sccn.ucsd.edu</a><br>
For digest mode, send an email with the subject "set digest
mime" to <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:eeglablist-request@sccn.ucsd.edu"
target="_blank">eeglablist-request@sccn.ucsd.edu</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<br clear="all">
<div><br>
</div>
-- <br>
<div dir="ltr">Makoto Miyakoshi<br>
Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience<br>
Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San
Diego<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>