<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<style type="text/css" style="display:none"><!--P{margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} --></style>
</head>
<body dir="ltr" style="font-size:12pt;color:#000000;background-color:#FFFFFF;font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">
<p>Hi everyone,</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>I have a question regarding the rejection of continuous EEG data. As I'm quite new to EEGLAB I apologize in advance if I've missed any information explaining the issue.</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>When rejecting portions of the continuous data (either visually or using <em>eeg_eegrej</em>), event latencies are updated but event durations appear to remain unchanged. As a consequence, when calculating event offsets based on (onset) latencies and durations,
the results are no longer correct (the end point of an event doesn't correspond to the correct sample point in the pruned dataset).<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Shouldn't the durations be updated in case a portion was removed which was "part" of an ongoing event?</p>
<p>Is there any reason not do to do so or any additional option/command I'm not familiar with?</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Thanks in advance!</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Hannah</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<div id="Signature">
<div name="divtagdefaultwrapper" style="margin:0px; font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">
<div class="BodyFragment"><font size="2">
<div class="PlainText">Hannah Hiebel, Mag.rer.nat.<br>
Cognitive Psychology & Neuroscience</div>
<div class="PlainText">Department of Psychology, University of Graz</div>
<div class="PlainText">Universitätsplatz 2, 8010 Graz, Austria<br>
<br>
Tel.: +43 (0)316 380-5080<br>
email: hannah.hiebel@uni-graz.at</div>
</font></div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>