[Eeglablist] powbase question (newtimef)

Makoto Miyakoshi mmiyakoshi at ucsd.edu
Tue Sep 2 11:50:06 PDT 2014

Dear Omar,

I thought Mikolaj's post below is related to your question.

Ramon, could you check if the documentation (i.e. help) is clear enough to
explain this?


On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 3:21 AM, Mikołaj Magnuski <imponderabilion at gmail.com
> wrote:

> Hey Lars,
> it depends on what you want to achieve. If you want to provide a baseline
> that you  previously computed yourself - use the 'powbase' option. If you
> want your baseline to be defined by a period in your epochs use the
> 'baseline' option.

On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Omar Mian <omian88 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
> I have a question about the 'powbase' output of newtimef.
> What does this output represent when the 'baseline' parameter is set to
> NaN?
> I was expecting the elements of powbase to be zero when 'baseline' is set
> to NaN (due to lack of baseline), but I find that they are non-zero.
> However they are different to when 'baseline' is left to the default value.
> Thanks
> Omar
> _______________________________________________
> Eeglablist page: http://sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab/eeglabmail.html
> To unsubscribe, send an empty email to
> eeglablist-unsubscribe at sccn.ucsd.edu
> For digest mode, send an email with the subject "set digest mime" to
> eeglablist-request at sccn.ucsd.edu

Makoto Miyakoshi
Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience
Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sccn.ucsd.edu/pipermail/eeglablist/attachments/20140902/2d15832d/attachment.html>

More information about the eeglablist mailing list