[Eeglablist] runica processing time discrepancy
mmiyakoshi at ucsd.edu
Fri Dec 26 14:12:58 PST 2014
I have no idea here. Please let us know your opinion.
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Makoto Miyakoshi <mmiyakoshi at ucsd.edu>
> Dear Matthew,
> You mean you used the same dataset and obtained that result? As I wrote
> recently, runica() speed depends on data quality.
> On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Matthew Moore <matthew.moore at otago.ac.nz>
>> Hi all,
>> I am currently doing a bit of ICA, and have noticed that my laptop
>> seems to complete the ICA analysis process faster (2'30'' vs 3'30'').
>> This seems to me anomalous, as the desktop should be substantially more
>> powerful than the laptop.
>> The laptop has a dual-core i5-4200 @ 1.6GHz and 8GB of RAM, while the
>> desktop has an 8-core FX-8320 @ 3.7GHz with 12GB RAM.
>> The only other significant difference between the two that I can think
>> of is that the laptop runs Windows 8 and Matlab R2014a, and the desktop
>> Windows 7 with Matlab R2013b.
>> I feel like things should be going a lot quicker on the desktop, has
>> anyone encountered this problem?
>> Regards, Matt
>> Eeglablist page: http://sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab/eeglabmail.html
>> To unsubscribe, send an empty email to
>> eeglablist-unsubscribe at sccn.ucsd.edu
>> For digest mode, send an email with the subject "set digest mime" to
>> eeglablist-request at sccn.ucsd.edu
> Makoto Miyakoshi
> Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience
> Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego
Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience
Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the eeglablist