[Eeglablist] "Frequency Smearing" and ERSP graphs

[Makoto Miyakoshi]

Dear Steven,

Unfortunately I agree with the reviewer. The choice of parameter for your
ERSP is not optimal.

You can find 2013 EEGLAB workshop materials (pdf) online.
http://sccn.ucsd.edu/wiki/EEGLAB_2013_UCSD
Check out the ones by Tim Mullen for theory and Makoto Miyakoshi for
practical understanding of the EEGLAB parameters for newtimef.

Makoto

On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Steven Pillen <stevendpillen at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello, EEGLAB-List.
>
> Here are some ERSP graphs included in a manuscript we submitted to a
> publication:
>
> http://i.imgur.com/KkvAGPA.png
> http://i.imgur.com/iLHeKY9.png
>
> One of the peer reviewers said that the graph showed "frequency smear",
> and we are not entirely sure what that means.  Is what you see in these
> images unusual?  If there is frequency smearing, what is it, and what can
> we do to correct or account for it?
>
> Thank you,
> Steven Pillen
>
> _______________________________________________
> Eeglablist page: http://sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab/eeglabmail.html
> To unsubscribe, send an empty email to
> eeglablist-unsubscribe at sccn.ucsd.edu
> For digest mode, send an email with the subject "set digest mime" to
> eeglablist-request at sccn.ucsd.edu
>



-- 
Makoto Miyakoshi
Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience
Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sccn.ucsd.edu/pipermail/eeglablist/attachments/20150505/a1c51809/attachment.html>