[Eeglablist] bad channels and average reference

[Simon-Shlomo Poil]

Dear Brittany,

You can exclude bad channels in the reference function in EEGLAB.
Alternatively you can also use the "Average reference (excluding bad
channels) function in the NBT toolbox (a plugin to EEGLAB) see,
https://www.nbtwiki.net/doku.php?id=tutorial:re_referencing#.VWcHxuffdt0

Best wishes,
--
Simon-Shlomo Poil, Dr.
LinkedIn profile: http://ch.linkedin.com/in/simonshlomopoil/

The Neurophysiological Biomarker Toolbox (NBT): http://www.nbtwiki.net
Outsource your EEG analysis!:
https://www.nbt-analytics.com/doku.php?id=nbtanalytics:outsource

My latest publications:
Integrative EEG biomarkers predict progression to Alzheimer's disease at
the MCI stage: http://l.nbtwiki.net/19jMuy8

The Amsterdam Resting-State Questionnaire reveals multiple phenotypes of
resting-state cognition: http://l.nbtwiki.net/17yblK7




2015-05-27 20:36 GMT+02:00 Brittany Alperin <balperin07 at gmail.com>:

> Hello
>
> I'm wondering what the best procedure is for dealing with bad channels
> when rereferencing to the average. For example, if while recording Fz is
> bad, do I include Fz in the average reference? Alternatively, do people
> interpolate bad channels before computing the average?
>
> Any recommendations would be helpful,
> Brittany
>
> _______________________________________________
> Eeglablist page: http://sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab/eeglabmail.html
> To unsubscribe, send an empty email to
> eeglablist-unsubscribe at sccn.ucsd.edu
> For digest mode, send an email with the subject "set digest mime" to
> eeglablist-request at sccn.ucsd.edu
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sccn.ucsd.edu/pipermail/eeglablist/attachments/20150528/2c4c2d16/attachment.html>