[Eeglablist] Question about testing hypothesis
valeriojus at gmail.com
Fri Nov 27 19:29:27 PST 2015
Thanks a lot.
1-Did you mean that I need to do some enhancement to the plot in order to
me more efficient for publication?
2- Did you mean each grayed column apply the p <0.05? What is the best way
to interpret the plot in this case? Should I say the 2 plots (center and
leftmost) are different in the latencies that are indicated by the gray
3- Should like this plot having such geayed columns get displayed in the
paper without having any associated data and information such mean and
standard deviation? What you could do when you might have like this plot?
4- If I have plot with condition p <0.05, but all the areas are white
instead of having gray colour. Does that means that the condition is not
On 26 Nov 2015 12:21, "Makoto Miyakoshi" <mmiyakoshi at ucsd.edu> wrote:
> Dear Valerio,
> The grayed areas in the rightmost plot shows the p<0.05 latencies. You
> probably want to reprocess the figure for publication anyway.
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 4:42 AM, valerio jus <valeriojus at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>> I need to examine my hypothesis based on p<0.05. Thus, can anyone help
>> with how to achieve this using the attached plot. How to know the value of
>> p that should be compared to 0.05 using the plot?
>> Thanks in advance.
>> Statistics of scalp channel ERP.png
>> Eeglablist page: http://sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab/eeglabmail.html
>> To unsubscribe, send an empty email to
>> eeglablist-unsubscribe at sccn.ucsd.edu
>> For digest mode, send an email with the subject "set digest mime" to
>> eeglablist-request at sccn.ucsd.edu
> Makoto Miyakoshi
> Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience
> Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the eeglablist