[Eeglablist] Is it better to run ICAs with average reference or with vertex reference prior to ICA for during data cleaning?
Tarik S Bel-Bahar
tarikbelbahar at gmail.com
Thu Apr 6 11:53:35 PDT 2017
Hello, some notes below
it depends on density of your eeg electrodes.
A rule of thumb is 32 channels or below use mastoid reference,
and 64 channels and up use average reference.
You can also examine recent rereferencing schemes in the literature that go
"beyond" average reference.
See also articles that compare ICA or EEG results with different
I recommend finding recent published articles in high-end journals that
used an eeg montage similar to yours,
and use the referencing scheme they used.
Please google past eeglablist discussions/comments on similar referencing
and rereferencing topics.
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 11:06 AM, David G Gilbert <dgilbert at siu.edu> wrote:
> Is it better to run ICAs with average reference or with vertex reference
> prior to ICA for during data cleaning?
> David Gilbert
> Department of Psychology
> Southern Illinois University Carbondale
> Eeglablist page: http://sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab/eeglabmail.html
> To unsubscribe, send an empty email to eeglablist-unsubscribe at sccn.
> For digest mode, send an email with the subject "set digest mime" to
> eeglablist-request at sccn.ucsd.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the eeglablist