[Eeglablist] EEGLAB ASR Question

[Johnson, John T.]

The best bet is to use -1 to disable any condition that should be disabled. This will make the output of eegh() make sense, and let you paste the command into your code. The events and epochs that are deleted should be reproducible across runs too.

Regards,
John

On 14 Mar 2019, at 12:12, Alterman, Bennett L wrote:

If using the GUI for ASR, using -1 to turn off an input field yields the loss of event markers (and eventually epochs), but writing off in the fields does not result in this loss. When using eegh to get the code, it returns a line that uses off, but the code does not run unless 'off' is used. However, while manually running ASR in the GUI does not result in the loss of events, running ASR from code does (and -1 vs. 'off' yield different numbers of events lost). Is there any way to resolve this issue?


Sincerely,
Bennett Alterman, M.S.

--
Ph.D. Student, Cognitive Motor Control Laboratory
School of Biological Sciences
Georgia Institute of Technology
bennett.alterman at gatech.edu
http://bennettalterman.wix.com/neuroimaging<http://bennettalterman.wixsite.com/neuroimaging>
https://www.linkedin.com/in/bennettalterman/
678.485.6318
_______________________________________________
Eeglablist page: http://sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab/eeglabmail.html
To unsubscribe, send an empty email to eeglablist-unsubscribe at sccn.ucsd.edu
For digest mode, send an email with the subject "set digest mime" to eeglablist-request at sccn.ucsd.edu

John T. Johnson
PhD Candidate - Cognitive Motor Control Laboratory
Lab TA NEURO 2001 Principles
School of Biological Sciences
Georgia Institute of Technology

678-575-2093
john.johnson at gatech.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sccn.ucsd.edu/pipermail/eeglablist/attachments/20190315/97985bf9/attachment.html>