[Eeglablist] Double Dipping with ICA

Nicholas Dogris drdogris at neurofieldneurotherapy.com
Mon Nov 9 08:51:47 PST 2020


Thank you very much for this information.  It is very helpful.

Cheers,

Nick



On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 1:11 PM Scott Makeig <smakeig at gmail.com> wrote:

> Re the double-dipping example Makoto provides: Don't neglect to check,
> however, whether and to what extent IC ERPs do contribute to the ICs signal
> variance - this may be less than 1% (i.e., removing the IC ERP from every
> trial reduces the overall IC signal variance by ~1%). If you wish, you can
> remove the ERPs from every trial after clustering, and then test
> differences in remaining cluster variance-not-explained-by-the-ERPs. Or,
> you can normalize the ERPs *before* clustering based on equivalent dipole
> location and normed ERPs, then test differences in cluster
> variance/power/etc.
>
> Scott
>
> On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 1:39 PM Makoto Miyakoshi <mmiyakoshi at ucsd.edu>
> wrote:
>
> > Dear Nick,
> >
> > Two things.
> >
> > 1. The second ICA you mentioned does not change the result. Just try it
> and
> > you see what happens.
> >
> > 2. Double dipping refers to a procedure that is known to inflate Type I
> > error. ICA uses mutual information, and you test amplitude/phase
> > metric--these two do not have apparent correlation. If you say, cluster
> ICs
> > by ERP waveforms, then perform ERP amplitude difference, this is double
> > dipping (why? because IC cluster's ERP variance is minimized by
> clustering,
> > but this variance information is being used in the subsequent statistical
> > test)
> >
> > Given that,
> >
> > > Are there reasons not to do this or to do it?
> >
> > You may do so but it is meaningless because the second ICA in that case
> > does nothing. And this has nothing to do with the double dipping problem.
> >
> > Makoto
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 8:22 AM Nicholas Dogris <
> > drdogris at neurofieldneurotherapy.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Will my data be distorted if I run ICA, remove IC's such as eye blinks,
> > and
> > > then run ICA again on the same dataset?  Are there reasons not to do
> this
> > > or to do it?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Nick
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Eeglablist page: http://sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab/eeglabmail.html
> > > To unsubscribe, send an empty email to
> > > eeglablist-unsubscribe at sccn.ucsd.edu
> > > For digest mode, send an email with the subject "set digest mime" to
> > > eeglablist-request at sccn.ucsd.edu
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Eeglablist page: http://sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab/eeglabmail.html
> > To unsubscribe, send an empty email to
> > eeglablist-unsubscribe at sccn.ucsd.edu
> > For digest mode, send an email with the subject "set digest mime" to
> > eeglablist-request at sccn.ucsd.edu
> >
>
>
> --
> Scott Makeig, Research Scientist and Director, Swartz Center for
> Computational Neuroscience, Institute for Neural Computation, University of
> California San Diego, La Jolla CA 92093-0559, http://sccn.ucsd.edu/~scott
> _______________________________________________
> Eeglablist page: http://sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab/eeglabmail.html
> To unsubscribe, send an empty email to
> eeglablist-unsubscribe at sccn.ucsd.edu
> For digest mode, send an email with the subject "set digest mime" to
> eeglablist-request at sccn.ucsd.edu
>



More information about the eeglablist mailing list