[Eeglablist] Methodological feedback requested: depth recordings and external EEG before attack behavior

[נתי שטרן]

Dear EEGLAB community,

I am sharing a new discussion manuscript and would welcome feedback on
an EEG analysis question: can a neural signal preceding an observed
attack in an awake animal be recovered from external EEG when paired
depth recordings are available?

A framework for validating neural signals before aggressive behavior
in animal models relevant to autism and schizophrenia
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/netanelcyber/psi-qeeg-bis/blob/6b79e9c39cd0532202659acbbe59a839facd7495/docs/research/PRE_ATTACK_EEG_VALIDATION_2026.md__;!!Mih3wA!E3flL2bWZXArUiRl_OHjDIAbcUgtjOBx6SttVx90r6lpbRQG0uN09Kg44ZsmxIsRNJF3ja4yB4ACnZHcs2U$ 

The proposed design combines synchronized depth electrophysiology,
external EEG, video and EMG after recovery from implantation. It
distinguishes controls, ASD-relevant, SCZ-relevant and combined
experimental conditions; the combined model itself requires
independent validation.

I would especially appreciate advice on EEGLAB-compatible
time-frequency analysis, common-reference and volume-conduction
controls, and separating pre-attack neural information from muscle and
movement signals. The final forecasting test would use external EEG
alone in held-out animals, reporting warning time and false alarms per
hour.

This is an AI-assisted hypothesis and proposed validation framework,
not a report of completed experiments or a validated warning system.
No new animal data were collected or analyzed, and the manuscript has
not been peer reviewed or accepted by a preprint server. The draft
includes the AI-use disclosure and pending author disclosure fields.

Please reply privately to nsh531 at gmail.com if you have methodological
feedback or relevant paired datasets.

Best regards,
Netanel Stern
Independent researcher, Israel