[Eeglablist] What would be the best way to determine dipole locations for P300 responses?
Fuh-Cherng Jeng
jeng at ohio.edu
Fri Sep 5 14:47:39 PDT 2008
Dear all,
I have recorded P300 responses using a 64-channel cap in two groups of
participants and found that the P300 latencies in group A is significantly
longer than those in group B. As a follow-up of this finding, I would like
to do some dipole fitting and see if the P300 dipole locations are
significantly different between the two groups. I have two methods in
mind, but am not sure which method would be making any sense at all.
sense than the other in terms of finding the dipole locations for P300
responses.
(1) use dipfit_erpeeg() to fit the ERP topography at the time point where
the P300 latency is determined by the experimenter.
(2) do ICA first and use multifit() to do a dipole fitting on a specific
ICA component that correspond the best to the P300 responses.
If anyone could help me with this or simply tell me a better way of finding
the P300 dipole locations, I would greatly appreciate it.
Sincerely,
Fuh
More information about the eeglablist
mailing list