[Eeglablist] P300 filter

[Arnaud Delorme]

Dear Anli,

you might want to look up this article below. Kapenman and Luck tried different filter settings before extracting the P300

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20374541

Best,

Arno

On Aug 14, 2012, at 9:57 AM, Elena Labkovsky wrote:

> All our studies are P300-based studies. Through years of research we figured out that the best filter to obtain reliable P300 component would be 0.05 to 6Hz.
> In our studies we compare the P300 reaction to different type of stimuli (fo example familiar vs novel stimuli). The above filter allows to get very good differential results.
>  
> I hope this helps.
>  
> Elena Labkovsky, Ph.D.
>  
> Rosenfeld Lab,
> Institute for Neuroscience   
> Northwestern University 
> Evanston, Il 60201   
>  
> From: Anli Wang <anliwang at gmail.com>
> To: eeglablist at sccn.ucsd.edu 
> Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2012 10:09 AM
> Subject: [Eeglablist] P300 filter
> 
> Hi EEG experts
> 
> I am running a study looking for P300 manipulation. I used 0.1-30Hz to filter the data but inducing the drifting problem. Do you know what would be the better filter for looking at P300?
> 
> Many thanks!
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Eeglablist page: http://sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab/eeglabmail.html
> To unsubscribe, send an empty email to eeglablist-unsubscribe at sccn.ucsd.edu
> For digest mode, send an email with the subject "set digest mime" to eeglablist-request at sccn.ucsd.edu
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Eeglablist page: http://sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab/eeglabmail.html
> To unsubscribe, send an empty email to eeglablist-unsubscribe at sccn.ucsd.edu
> For digest mode, send an email with the subject "set digest mime" to eeglablist-request at sccn.ucsd.edu

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sccn.ucsd.edu/pipermail/eeglablist/attachments/20120818/80fd32f0/attachment.html>