[Eeglablist] Questions regarding the pipeline of data processing.
Boillat Yohan
yohan.boillat at epfl.ch
Mon Apr 8 17:45:08 PDT 2013
Dear all,
I am new to the EEG technique and I have several questions concerning the procedure for the data processing part.
The data are recorded with a SynAmps2 64 Channel Quik-Cap. The sampling rate is 1000Hz.
This is an ERP study with an interest in both early and late components.
I plan to do the following steps:
1. I remove the bad electrodes (one or two max.).
2. I re-reference the data to the average..
3. I apply a high-pass filter of 0.1Hz (IIR Butterworth, Order 2, ERPLAB).
4. I apply a low-pass filter of 45Hz (IIR Butterworth, Order 2, ERPLAB).
5. I epoch the data according to the stimulus onset (-1000ms to 1000ms) and I use the whole epoch as a baseline.
as suggested by Groppe et al. (2009).
6. I reject epochs with gross artifact in order to have around 10% discarded (Delorme et al. 2007).
7. I run the ICA (runica, extended).
8. I use ADJUST (Mognon et al. 2010) in order to identify the components related to eye artifacts and then I remove them.
9. Spline interpolation for the electrodes previously removed.
9. Finally, the epochs are baseline corrected with a pre-stimulus period of 400ms and then averaged according to the different conditions
So, my questions are:
1.Which criteria should I use to detect bad electrodes? I do not feel very happy with the pop_rejchan() function provided by EEGLAB as
even by playing with the threshold it was not able to detect a channel that was obviously very bad.
2. Can I re-reference to the average if one or two electrodes were removed?
3. Is it correct to do the spline interpolation after the ICA?
4. Does it make sense to do a second baseline correction after the ICA, but this time with a pre-stimulus period?
If you have more general comments about this procedure, they are more than welcome.
Thanks a lot!
Yohan Boillat
More information about the eeglablist
mailing list