[Eeglablist] Electrodes Values
Arnaud Delorme
arno at ucsd.edu
Sat May 25 08:48:57 PDT 2013
Hi Stefan,
you are the one that wrote the original comment on GFP on the http://sccn.ucsd.edu/pipermail/eeglablist/2008/002132.html
Do you agree with Jeff that a N normalization is preferable to N-1?
Thanks,
Arno
On 21 May 2013, at 21:58, Barry Oken wrote:
> For Andreas, the rationale for N-1 in much of statistics is that it gives a more unbiased estimate of the parameter in the whole population. If one really just wants to know the parameter in one particular sample, be it a single EEG or a single group of subjects without thinking about the population that it was sampled from, then, as Jeff commented, N is correct.
> Barry Oken
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: eeglablist-bounces at sccn.ucsd.edu [mailto:eeglablist-bounces at sccn.ucsd.edu] On Behalf Of Eriksen, Jeff :LPH EEG
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 12:44 PM
> To: Andreas Widmann; Arnaud Delorme
> Cc: eeglablist at sccn.ucsd.edu
> Subject: Re: [Eeglablist] Electrodes Values
>
> All:
>
> I believe we should use N, not N-1. This is a physical quantity, not a statistical estimate of some population parameter. If I want the RMS of a time series, I use every time sample and divide by the total number of time samples. If I want spatial global field power, I want to use all N spatial samples as well.
>
> -Jeff Eriksen
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: eeglablist-bounces at sccn.ucsd.edu [mailto:eeglablist-bounces at sccn.ucsd.edu] On Behalf Of Andreas Widmann
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 7:19 AM
> To: Arnaud Delorme
> Cc: eeglablist at sccn.ucsd.edu
> Subject: Re: [Eeglablist] Electrodes Values
>
> Dear Arno,
>
> your notion of "small normalization difference" made me curious where this definition of GFP might originate. Where is it defined with "N - 1 normalization"? Also in ERPLAB GFP appears to be implemented according to this definition.
>
> However, in the original paper by Lehmann and Skrandies (1980) it is either defined as "root of the mean of the squared potential differences between all possible electrode pairs" (formula 1A) gfp = sqrt(1 / (2 * 32) * sum(sum((repmat(tmp(:, 1), [1 32]) - repmat(tmp(:, 1), [1 32])') .^ 2))) (similar to implementation in eeg_gfp.m) or as root mean squared voltage of the average referenced data (formula 1B), with gfp_1A = gfp_1B * sqrt(nChans).
>
> Also some other papers which explicitly define the term use the latter definition (e.g., Brandeis et al., 1992; Roth et al. 1995; Murray et al., 2008; Koenig et al., 2009), that is, normalize by N not N - 1. Shouldn't we possibly better use gfp = std(tmp, 1) % GFP normalized by N to compute GFP?
>
> What is the rationale behind N - 1 normalization? Any ideas?
> Thank you! Best,
> Andreas
>
> Am 18.05.2013 um 19:21 schrieb Arnaud Delorme <arno at ucsd.edu>:
>
>> Dear Kleber,
>>
>> one way to get a global measure proportional to microvolt is to use the Global Field Power (GFP).
>>
>> http://sccn.ucsd.edu/pipermail/eeglablist/2008/002132.html
>>
>> The root mean square (RMS) value is also sometimes used.
>> The root mean square value on average reference data is similar to the GFP (with small normalization difference).
>>
>> tmp = rand(32,10); % simulated data 32 channels 10 points
>> std(tmp) % GFP
>> sqrt(mean(tmp.^2)) % RMS
>> sqrt(sum((tmp-repmat(mean(tmp), [size(tmp,1) 1])).^2)/(size(tmp,1)-1))
>> % RMS on average reference with n-1 normalization (same as GFP)
>>
>> I am not sure RMS on a common reference should be used. Any other comments on this appreciated.
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Arno
>>
>> On 16 May 2013, at 15:15, Kleber de Aguiar wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Everyone in this list,
>>>
>>> I would like to know if anyone of you can answer me a doubt about de
>>> reading of the values of a group of electrodes in a EEG exam, as I"ll explain bellow:
>>>
>>>
>>> 1- Spliting the EEG recording in slots of time, that I will call them
>>> as "samples";
>>>
>>> 2- Assuming that "n" electrodes were used in this EEG Recording;
>>>
>>> 3 - In every "sample" of the recording, there will have "n"
>>> electrodes values corresponding for each electrodes;
>>>
>>> MY QUESTIONS:
>>>
>>> * How can I sum this electrodes values of the sample in a single
>>> value that represents the total of microvolts oh that "sample"?
>>>
>>> * How can I describe the values of "y" samples in a single value that
>>> represents these "y" sample values?
>>>
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Kleber, a fresh researcher in this field.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Programa de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computação PESC/COPPE/UFRJ
>>> Visite nossa página web (http://www.cos.ufrj.br)
>>> ------***------
>>> Kleber de Aguiar
>>> Tecnólogo em Sistemas de Computação
>>> Mestrando em Engenharia de Sistemas e Computação - PESC/COPPE/UFRJ
>>> Tutor Presencial CEDERJ/UAB - Curso de Computação UFF
>>> Twitter: @kleberIAguiar
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Eeglablist page: http://sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab/eeglabmail.html
>>> To unsubscribe, send an empty email to
>>> eeglablist-unsubscribe at sccn.ucsd.edu
>>> For digest mode, send an email with the subject "set digest mime" to
>>> eeglablist-request at sccn.ucsd.edu
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Eeglablist page: http://sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab/eeglabmail.html
>> To unsubscribe, send an empty email to
>> eeglablist-unsubscribe at sccn.ucsd.edu
>> For digest mode, send an email with the subject "set digest mime" to
>> eeglablist-request at sccn.ucsd.edu
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Eeglablist page: http://sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab/eeglabmail.html
> To unsubscribe, send an empty email to eeglablist-unsubscribe at sccn.ucsd.edu
> For digest mode, send an email with the subject "set digest mime" to eeglablist-request at sccn.ucsd.edu
>
> _______________________________________________
> Eeglablist page: http://sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab/eeglabmail.html
> To unsubscribe, send an empty email to eeglablist-unsubscribe at sccn.ucsd.edu
> For digest mode, send an email with the subject "set digest mime" to eeglablist-request at sccn.ucsd.edu
More information about the eeglablist
mailing list