[Eeglablist] newtimef

[Farzad Beheshti]

Exactly Makoto. Thank you very much for your clarification.
Yes, why the survived blobs look different?

Thank you


On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 1:05 AM, Makoto Miyakoshi <mmiyakoshi at ucsd.edu>
wrote:

> Sorry, I mean I was guessing the cause of the inconsistency Farzad pointed
> out.
> So he was asking that after statistical threshold masking, the remaining
> significant results should show the same blob patterns compared with
> unmasking results, but actually when the mask was applied the survived
> blobs look different. Why is this?
>
> Makoto
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Arnaud Delorme <arno at ucsd.edu> wrote:
>
>> Hi Makoto,
>>
>> Presenting T values or F values is not possible in the graphic interface.
>> However, it is possible from the command line.
>> Use newtimef to compute the ERPS and statistics and retrieve this
>> function's output.
>> Then use the function tftopo to plot the time-frequency images and you
>> may provide as input statistics returned by the function above.
>>
>> Same can be done at the STUDY level with std_erspplot and std_plottf.
>>
>> Arno
>>
>> On Jun 18, 2014, at 8:26 PM, Makoto Miyakoshi <mmiyakoshi at ucsd.edu>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Farzad and Arno,
>>
>> Ok I think I got it.
>> Arno, it is possible that after bootstrap testing you present t-score or
>> something instead of the raw values in ERPS plots?
>>
>> Makoto
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Makoto Miyakoshi <mmiyakoshi at ucsd.edu>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Farzad,
>>>
>>> I don't see much difference... you know you are using different color
>>> scales i.e. 'erspmax', 2.5 vs. 'erspmax', 4. Why don't you use either 2.5
>>> or 4 to make the comparison? Even better is to numerically compare 'ersp'
>>> that is the first variable in the output, which should show binary matching.
>>>
>>> Makoto
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 3:57 AM, Farzad Beheshti <
>>> farzadbeheshti12 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear EEGLAB users
>>>>
>>>> I have a problem with newtimef().
>>>>
>>>> I am trying to plot the ERSP response for the difference of two
>>>> conditions. I do not use a common baseline between conditions.
>>>>
>>>> It seems the ERSP figure before bootstraping does not match with the
>>>> one after bootstraping, at all.
>>>>
>>>> please look at the results in the following link.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B09QWUmbWKrEeTdDZDNkT25pb0E/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>
>>>> If we compare ERSP results in the two figures, condition1 - condition2
>>>> does not match. Do you have any idea? What is going on here?
>>>>
>>>>       Thanks
>>>>       Farzad
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Eeglablist page: http://sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab/eeglabmail.html
>>>> To unsubscribe, send an empty email to
>>>> eeglablist-unsubscribe at sccn.ucsd.edu
>>>> For digest mode, send an email with the subject "set digest mime" to
>>>> eeglablist-request at sccn.ucsd.edu
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Makoto Miyakoshi
>>> Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience
>>> Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Makoto Miyakoshi
>> Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience
>> Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Makoto Miyakoshi
> Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience
> Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sccn.ucsd.edu/pipermail/eeglablist/attachments/20140619/513cb73f/attachment.html>