[Eeglablist] (no subject)

[Ayda Ghahremani]

Thanks Iman.

Yes, I also think visual inspection seems to be my best choice in this
case.

I appreciate your consultation.

All the best,
Ayda

_____________________________________________________________


On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Iman M.Rezazadeh <irezazadeh at ucdavis.edu>
wrote:

> Theoretically you can apply ICA to those two channels and achieve 2
> independent sources. But the main point is how do you want to interpret
> those two sources. Why don’t you use other techniques like thresholding and
> visual inspection if you would not do real-time processing?
>
> -Iman
>
>
>
> ============================================
>
> *Iman M.Rezazadeh, Ph.D. , M.Sc., B.Sc.*
>
> Research Associate II
>
> UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine
>
> Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior
>
> 760 Westwood Plaza, Ste 47-448
>
> Los Angeles, CA  90095
>
> http://www.linkedin.com/pub/iman-m-rezazadeh/10/859/840/
>
>
>
> *From:* eeglablist-bounces at sccn.ucsd.edu [mailto:
> eeglablist-bounces at sccn.ucsd.edu] *On Behalf Of *Ayda Ghahremani
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 24, 2014 4:35 PM
> *To:* eeglablist
> *Subject:* [Eeglablist] (no subject)
>
>
>
> Dear EEGLAB,
>
>
>
>
>
> I have only a few electrode information from my subjects,as they had
> bandages on their head. I want to analyze FP1 and Fz. These electrodes are
> so close to eyes and therefore, prone to eye blinks. I am wondering if I
> can do the ICA analysis for eye blink rejection on only these two channels.
> If so, how can I detect the eye-blink related components, since I do not
> have their scalp maps.
>
>
>
> Or, there may be a more appropriate way to do so?
>
>
>
> I appreciate your help,
>
> Ayda
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sccn.ucsd.edu/pipermail/eeglablist/attachments/20140625/92d7d4f7/attachment.html>