[Eeglablist] Comparing different ICA procedures

Jason Palmer japalmer29 at gmail.com
Thu Apr 24 17:10:51 PDT 2014

Also the highly germane: Independent EEG Sources are Dipolar




From: eeglablist-bounces at sccn.ucsd.edu [mailto:eeglablist-bounces at sccn.ucsd.edu] On Behalf Of Srinivas Kota
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 11:04 AM
To: Norbert Franke
Cc: eeglablist at sccn.ucsd.edu
Subject: Re: [Eeglablist] Comparing different ICA procedures


Check this one  

Evaluation of PCA and ICA of Simulated ERPs:

Promax vs. Infomax Rotations



On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Norbert Franke <nfranke at uni-bonn.de> wrote:

Hi everybody,

I am comparing different ICA procedures.

In my case the results after running different ICAs with the same EEG dataset (always beginning at scratch) are very similiar but not always the same. To decide which ICA procedure fits best I need to know more about preconditions of these algorithms. Otherwise its a danger to use the results which fits best to what I want to find and thats not science.

Is there literature existing which compares ICAs?

Norbert Franke
Eeglablist page: http://sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab/eeglabmail.html
To unsubscribe, send an empty email to eeglablist-unsubscribe at sccn.ucsd.edu
For digest mode, send an email with the subject "set digest mime" to eeglablist-request at sccn.ucsd.edu



Srinivas Kota, Ph.D
Research Scientist
Movement and Neurosciences Center
Institute for Rehabilitation Science and Engineering
Madonna Rehabilitation Hospital
5401 South St, Lincoln, NE 68506
Email: svkota at gmail.com
Ph:  (618) 319-0471 (cell)
 <https://owa.madonna.org/owa/redir.aspx?C=RNnR5lrQvEmYU7lVtl6kLHIjwe3PiNAI8ouI90lD2Vnn4niuQ5QMBdLYDKmByFhfb525xS5XXT8.&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.madonna.org%2fresearch_institute%2findex.html> www.madonna.org/research_institute/index.html  

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sccn.ucsd.edu/pipermail/eeglablist/attachments/20140424/fea0178c/attachment.html>

More information about the eeglablist mailing list