[Eeglablist] Question on removing bad channels and epochs using FASTER

Makoto Miyakoshi mmiyakoshi at ucsd.edu
Mon Jun 15 10:54:56 PDT 2015

Dear Jessica,

My colleague told me that both needs ICA (some of the processes in FASTER
works without ICA outputs, but you'll need it later anyway). I personally
don't use them so am not knowledgeable, but to run ICA you want to include
only clean portion of data. Make sure at least that your data is free of
any outrageous artifacts that makes ICA fail to converge!


On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Jessica Satterwhite <jessksat at nmsu.edu>

>  Good afternoon,
>  We are trying to use FASTER or ADJUST to automatically clean EEG data by
> removing bad channels and epochs. Does anyone know if it is best to do ICA
> before starting either FASTER or ADJUST? Faster has the capability to do
> many pre-processing steps including ICA. Is it better to do ICA first and
> look at the components before using FASTER?
>  Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>  Thank you,
>  Jessica Satterwhite
> _______________________________________________
> Eeglablist page: http://sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab/eeglabmail.html
> To unsubscribe, send an empty email to
> eeglablist-unsubscribe at sccn.ucsd.edu
> For digest mode, send an email with the subject "set digest mime" to
> eeglablist-request at sccn.ucsd.edu

Makoto Miyakoshi
Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience
Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sccn.ucsd.edu/pipermail/eeglablist/attachments/20150615/fdd8781e/attachment.html>

More information about the eeglablist mailing list