[Eeglablist] Error when precomputing channel measures for between subjects study design

[Makoto Miyakoshi]

Dear Julie and Alyson,

Sorry for getting back to you late Julie. I thought I've responded to you
but I did not.
I talked to a developer and confirmed that this particular problem is not
filed yet. He did mention that there was potentially related one filed
already, but he was not sure about the relevance. I feel terribly sorry but
could you please file the problem here? You can basically copy and paste
what you have described in the email.
https://sccn.ucsd.edu/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi
I deeply appreciate your patience and cooperation.

Makoto

On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Alyson Abel <amills at mail.sdsu.edu> wrote:

> I actually have been having this same issue. I am trying to run a 2 group
> x 6 condition study. All datasets look fine (and all have 64 channels) when
> I load them but I get the same error as reported by Julie "Datasets to be
> concatenated do not have the same number of channels" . I am using MATLAB
> R2014a and the latest EEGLAB.
>
> Thank you for any feedback on this issue,
> Alyson
>
>
>
> Re: [Eeglablist] Error when precomputing channel measures for between
> subjects study design
> Dear Julie,
>
> If I remember correctly, the cause of this (or related) problem must have
> identified and fixed. Let me confirm it and get back to you.
>
> Makoto
>
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Schneider, Julie <jxs114631 at utdallas.edu>
>  wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> I have been consistently receiving the error "Datasets to be
>> concatenated do not have the same number of channels" during
>> precomputing of channel measures.  I am facing a similar situation as
>> mentioned in the thread:
>> http://sccn.ucsd.edu/pipermail/eeglablist/2015/009848.html in that when
>> manually checking each dataset, they appear to have 64 channels each.
>>
>>
>> However, when I tried using Makoto's recommendations to resolve this
>> issue (which were greatly appreciated!) the download of a new EEGlab was
>> only temporarily helpful, and the interpolation process remained
>> necessary.  I have found that, across every study, this issue only exists
>> when trying to compare GROUPS (between subjects design).  When running a
>> within subjects study design, using the exact same data (i.e. same channel
>> numbers) I have no issues.  How could I be using the same data and have it
>> successfully precompute within subjects but suddenly have an inconsistent
>> number of channels when precomputing between subjects?  Any recommendations
>> are greatly appreciated!
>>
>>
>> Thank you in advance for your help!
>>
>> Julie
>>
>>
>> Julie M. Schneider, M.S.
>>
>> Doctoral Student
>>
>> The Developmental Neurolinguistics Lab
>>
>> Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas
>>
> ---
> Alyson D. Abel, Ph.D.
> Assistant Professor, School of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences
> San Diego State University
> 5500 Campanile Dr., Rm 227
> San Diego, CA 92182
> alyson.abel at mail.sdsu.edu
> Office phone: (619) 594-4694
>
> _______________________________________________
> Eeglablist page: http://sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab/eeglabmail.html
> To unsubscribe, send an empty email to
> eeglablist-unsubscribe at sccn.ucsd.edu
> For digest mode, send an email with the subject "set digest mime" to
> eeglablist-request at sccn.ucsd.edu
>



-- 
Makoto Miyakoshi
Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience
Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sccn.ucsd.edu/pipermail/eeglablist/attachments/20160420/e1c456f6/attachment.html>