[Eeglablist] Is CleanLine working?
Malte Anders
malteanders at gmail.com
Fri Apr 24 15:22:04 PDT 2020
Hi Makoto,
I will shed some light onto this next week and have a look at the
differences.
Malte
Makoto Miyakoshi <mmiyakoshi at ucsd.edu> schrieb am Sa., 25. Apr. 2020, 00:17:
> Dear list members,
>
> I got information from developers that CleanLine implemented in PREP
> Pipeline has fixed bugs from the original CleanLine.
> Actually I was surprised to find out that PREP does not use the original
> CleanLine files but the implemented functions seemed heavily re-organized
> even if using a large part of the original CleanLine code.
>
> Is anyone interested in testing the performance difference?
>
> Makoto
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 2:36 PM Makoto Miyakoshi <mmiyakoshi at ucsd.edu>
> wrote:
>
> > Dear list members,
> >
> > I have never been satisfied with the result with CleanLine. In fact, I
> > think it is not working as it should be.
> >
> > Can anyone run the following test and share the results? I would greatly
> > appreciate it.
> >
> > 1) Prepare 1-min long 1-ch data with 60Hz pure sine wave.
> > 2) Find CleanLine parameters that can completely remove this 60Hz sine
> > wave so that it returns a flat line as a result.
> >
> > I doubt if we can achieve this. Can we? But if it cannot pass this simple
> > test, what's the point... and what's the best result is like as of now?
> >
> > Makoto
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Eeglablist page: http://sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab/eeglabmail.html
> To unsubscribe, send an empty email to
> eeglablist-unsubscribe at sccn.ucsd.edu
> For digest mode, send an email with the subject "set digest mime" to
> eeglablist-request at sccn.ucsd.edu
>
More information about the eeglablist
mailing list