[Eeglablist] Is CleanLine working?

[Makoto Miyakoshi]

Thanks Malte.

On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 3:22 PM Malte Anders <malteanders at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Makoto,
>
> I will shed some light onto this next week and have a look at the
> differences.
>
> Malte
>
> Makoto Miyakoshi <mmiyakoshi at ucsd.edu> schrieb am Sa., 25. Apr. 2020,
> 00:17:
>
>> Dear list members,
>>
>> I got information from developers that CleanLine implemented in PREP
>> Pipeline has fixed bugs from the original CleanLine.
>> Actually I was surprised to find out that PREP does not use the original
>> CleanLine files but the implemented functions seemed heavily re-organized
>> even if using a large part of the original CleanLine code.
>>
>> Is anyone interested in testing the performance difference?
>>
>> Makoto
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 2:36 PM Makoto Miyakoshi <mmiyakoshi at ucsd.edu>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Dear list members,
>> >
>> > I have never been satisfied with the result with CleanLine. In fact, I
>> > think it is not working as it should be.
>> >
>> > Can anyone run the following test and share the results? I would greatly
>> > appreciate it.
>> >
>> > 1) Prepare 1-min long 1-ch data with 60Hz pure sine wave.
>> > 2) Find CleanLine parameters that can completely remove this 60Hz sine
>> > wave so that it returns a flat line as a result.
>> >
>> > I doubt if we can achieve this. Can we? But if it cannot pass this
>> simple
>> > test, what's the point...  and what's the best result is like as of now?
>> >
>> > Makoto
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> Eeglablist page: http://sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab/eeglabmail.html
>> To unsubscribe, send an empty email to
>> eeglablist-unsubscribe at sccn.ucsd.edu
>> For digest mode, send an email with the subject "set digest mime" to
>> eeglablist-request at sccn.ucsd.edu
>>
>