[Eeglablist] wavletcycles fastor

[Elena Orekhova]

Dear EEGLab users

 

Does anybody know the reason to use particular 'wavletcycles fastor' in
timef function?

Certainly, the picture looks better with the default 0.5 factor, than
with both 1 or 0 factors, but can it be misleading? Intuitively, factor
1 (no increase standard wavelets) seems to be more precise, is not it?

Elena

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sccn.ucsd.edu/pipermail/eeglablist/attachments/20060412/fad95017/attachment.html>