[Eeglablist] One or two dipoles

[Makoto Miyakoshi]

Dear Bernhardsson,

Definitely two dipoles. It's not primarily because much smaller r.v., but
rather because your scalp topo shows bilateral foci.

Makoto

2013/2/7 Bernhardsson Jens <Jens.Bernhardsson at miun.se>

> Hello,****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> How would you dipole fit this component? ****
>
> ** **
>
> I do not find it sufficient to fit this component with only one dipole.
> However, the symmetrical dipole fitting is not as clear cut as it is with
> the m-shaped bilateral occipital component. The corresponding right sided
> topographical map (not attached) do not have this bilateral activation, and
> fits fine with one dipole (rv 1.7%). ****
>
> ** **
>
> So, one or two dipoles?****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Best****
>
> Jens****
>
> ** **
>
> _______________________________________________
> Eeglablist page: http://sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab/eeglabmail.html
> To unsubscribe, send an empty email to
> eeglablist-unsubscribe at sccn.ucsd.edu
> For digest mode, send an email with the subject "set digest mime" to
> eeglablist-request at sccn.ucsd.edu
>



-- 
Makoto Miyakoshi
JSPS Postdoctral Fellow for Research Abroad
Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience
Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sccn.ucsd.edu/pipermail/eeglablist/attachments/20130207/2d0c1fe2/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 22478 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sccn.ucsd.edu/pipermail/eeglablist/attachments/20130207/2d0c1fe2/attachment.png>