[Eeglablist] ICA and LPP

Makoto Miyakoshi mmiyakoshi at ucsd.edu
Thu Feb 27 22:16:46 PST 2014

Dear Valentina,

I remember Stephan Debener wrote in a post to the list a few years ago that
1Hz high-pass filter for ICA and apply the weight matrix to 0.1Hz high-pass
filtered data produced the best results.


2014-02-26 6:39 GMT-08:00 Valentina Nicolardi <valentinanicolardi at gmail.com>

> Dear List,
> I was wondering whether anybody knows why ICA is not apllied to the late
> positive potential (LPP) pre-processing, most of studies I found uses
> classical methods of artifact removal.
>  I thought this may be due to the low cut-off of the high pass filter, is
> there anyone with experience in the filed?
> May be worth running ICA on 1 Hz filtered data and then apply the weights
> and spheres to the 0.1 Hz data?
> Best
> Valentina Nicolardi
> _______________________________________________
> Eeglablist page: http://sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab/eeglabmail.html
> To unsubscribe, send an empty email to
> eeglablist-unsubscribe at sccn.ucsd.edu
> For digest mode, send an email with the subject "set digest mime" to
> eeglablist-request at sccn.ucsd.edu

Makoto Miyakoshi
Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience
Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sccn.ucsd.edu/pipermail/eeglablist/attachments/20140227/d88e08cb/attachment.html>

More information about the eeglablist mailing list