[Eeglablist] powbase question (newtimef)

[Makoto Miyakoshi]

Dear Omar,

I thought Mikolaj's post below is related to your question.

Ramon, could you check if the documentation (i.e. help) is clear enough to
explain this?

Makoto

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 3:21 AM, Mikołaj Magnuski <imponderabilion at gmail.com
> wrote:

> Hey Lars,
>
> it depends on what you want to achieve. If you want to provide a baseline
> that you  previously computed yourself - use the 'powbase' option. If you
> want your baseline to be defined by a period in your epochs use the
> 'baseline' option.
>


On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Omar Mian <omian88 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I have a question about the 'powbase' output of newtimef.
> What does this output represent when the 'baseline' parameter is set to
> NaN?
>
> I was expecting the elements of powbase to be zero when 'baseline' is set
> to NaN (due to lack of baseline), but I find that they are non-zero.
> However they are different to when 'baseline' is left to the default value.
>
> Thanks
>
> Omar
>
> _______________________________________________
> Eeglablist page: http://sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab/eeglabmail.html
> To unsubscribe, send an empty email to
> eeglablist-unsubscribe at sccn.ucsd.edu
> For digest mode, send an email with the subject "set digest mime" to
> eeglablist-request at sccn.ucsd.edu
>



-- 
Makoto Miyakoshi
Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience
Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sccn.ucsd.edu/pipermail/eeglablist/attachments/20140902/2d15832d/attachment.html>