[Eeglablist] Adjust data rank for ICA?

Daniele Scanzi dsca347 at aucklanduni.ac.nz
Thu Feb 16 12:47:37 PST 2023


Hi Julia,

>From my understanding, you should still change that line (I think it is
line 624) from max to min, otherwise 'runica' most likely won't adjust for
rank-deficient data.

Cheers,

Daniele

On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 at 09:34, Julia Basso <jbasso at vt.edu> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> We are reading Makato's preprocessing pipeline and utilizing the general
> pipeline for our dataset. We have interpolated across some bad channels and
> have taken note of the section on "Adjust data rank for ICA". We see that
> he recommends changing one line of code in pop_runica() from max to min, to
> adjust for the number of interpolated channels. However, this was a note
> from 5/17/19. Has anything been adjusted in the current code to adjust for
> this problem?
>
> Do you recommend doing this or should we leave it at max?
>
> Thank you for any help you can provide!
>
> Best,
>
> Dr. Basso
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Eeglablist page: http://sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab/eeglabmail.html
> To unsubscribe, send an empty email to
> eeglablist-unsubscribe at sccn.ucsd.edu
> For digest mode, send an email with the subject "set digest mime" to
> eeglablist-request at sccn.ucsd.edu
>



More information about the eeglablist mailing list