[Eeglablist] runica vs binica

[Becky Prince]

Hi,

Just wanted to say that I have the same question with regard to 'fastica'.
 I'd be interested to hear about comparisons between all three methods
('runica', 'binica' and 'fastica').

Thanks!

____________________________________________

Becky Gilbert (nee Prince)
PhD Researcher

Room A109
Department of Psychology
University of York
Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK


On 21 October 2013 18:39, Eduardo Schenberg <edueeg at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello All,
>
> I have been studying ICA tutorial in the EEGLab website, and I would just
> like to confirm that binica and runica perform the same calculations in the
> dataset, with binica being faster because it employs C code. Is that right?
> Has anyone actually compared the outputs so I could be sure they result the
> same?
>
> many thanks
>
> eduardo
> _______________________________________________
> Eeglablist page: http://sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab/eeglabmail.html
> To unsubscribe, send an empty email to
> eeglablist-unsubscribe at sccn.ucsd.edu
> For digest mode, send an email with the subject "set digest mime" to
> eeglablist-request at sccn.ucsd.edu
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sccn.ucsd.edu/pipermail/eeglablist/attachments/20131022/a15bec52/attachment.html>